The page lists out a variety of other things that are a lot more likely (but not definitely) to involve infringing -- such as using file sharing networks to share copyrighted songs, or emailing songs around. But using a wireless router? As Dowd discusses, the three federal court rulings involving copyright that mention wireless routers, all use it as a defense against infringement, because it highlights how someone else may have used the connection.
So why is Boston College telling students that simply using a wireless router is a sign of infringement?
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
"
No comments:
Post a Comment