loading
I am currently looking for someone to help out with this blog. I didn't realize the scope that this blog would effect. Hits from countries in political strife and the like, people looking for a way to communicate outside of government control. If you would like to help please send me an email George dot Endrulat at Gmail dot Com.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Issue 1140 - android - RFE: Mesh networking - Android - An Open Handset Alliance Project - Google Project Hosting

Issue 1140 - android - RFE: Mesh networking - Android - An Open Handset Alliance Project - Google Project Hosting

Reported by militias...@gmail.com, Oct 30, 2008
Enable phones to communicate with one another by mesh networking. See http://www.laptop.org/ and http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9852477088.html . This would enable several cooperating phones to self-configure themselves as a mobile LAN without having to go through the cellular network or the Internet backbone. Could provide critical service in emergencies. 
Comment 1 by jrol...@linux-migration.net, Nov 1, 2008
This might be combined with a push-to-talk functionality that would enable talk among phones even if there is no cellular coverage at that point, or to extend the range of cellular coverage by relaying through one cooperating phone within range. 
Comment 2 by shadowdr...@gmail.com, Nov 1, 2008
the problem with this kind of feature is that any device in the mesh could  potentially be a sniffer. the feature would have to be more of a buddy connect type  of thing with no hopping onto the cellular network, otherwise critical information  could be stolen, and data plans that aren't unlimited could be quickly drained.  encrypted peer to peer wireless LAN would be nice though for connecting to friends  to share data, play games and etc. 
Comment 3 by jrol...@linux-migration.net, Nov 1, 2008
The concept of mesh networking doesn't presuppose the network is open to all would-be nodes. Indeed, it incorporates strong encryption as the default. It is the system being used by the U.S. military in combat operations, which allows every soldier with a computer to communicate with every other, and show one another's position and situation, but it is certainly not open to unauthorized systems. Of course, if the nodes were owned by different parties, there would need to be a protocol for adding trusted nodes certified by existing trusted nodes. 
Comment 4 by dornhet...@gmail.com, Nov 19, 2008
If the wifi radio hardware can allow it, it would be helpful if the device could participate in a connection to a wifi AP separately and and at the same time as participating in a mesh network.  The two connections would be viewed by linux as two separate interfaces, each with their own IP address, etc. 
Comment 5 by project member jbq@google.com, Dec 17, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.) 
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
Comment 6 by project member jbq@google.com, Aug 24, 2009
(No comment was entered for this change.) 
Labels: Component-System
Comment 7 by project member jbq@google.com, Aug 27, 2009
(No comment was entered for this change.) 
Labels: -Component-System Component-Device
Comment 8 by mattlov...@gmail.com, Aug 27, 2009
@dornhetzel, I agree.  Data connection via WiFi hardware would be great, if it is  possible that android handsets can act at both host and client.    I don't believe it is possible to develop mesh networking via cellular radio due to  FCC (or otherwise) licensing.    This sort of WiFi (or bluetooth, even) based mesh network would be ideal in emergency  response scenarios where commercial communications are non-functional.  In urban  areas, if the density of people with mesh-wifi enabled mobile devices were high  enough it might be possible to maintain a civilian communication network.  
Comment 9 by mjc1...@googlemail.com, Oct 15, 2009
How does this fit with the new Wi-Fi Direct announcement? 
Comment 10 by lokim...@gmail.com, Oct 17, 2009
I'm actually very interested in this topic. I have a couple interesting social mesh  networking applications I want to write but I need a mobile device with a wifi card  that people actually take with them. Android would be ideal if they supported 802.11s  or the latest linux kernel which has support built in. 
Comment 12 by pette...@gmail.com, Apr 16, 2010
In what way would it go against fcc regulations? Trafficwise it would just be a large-scale Wi-Fi LAN wouldnt it? 
Comment 13 by mmi...@gmail.com, Apr 16, 2010
Just this year there will be probably a Google Summer of Code project dealing with adding a simple GUI for OLSR mesh protocol which would enable meshing of Android phones in community wireless networks using OLSR:  http://wiki.freifunk.net/Ideas#Android_OLSR_GUI  But it will require a rooted phone. It would be great if it would be possible to use ad-hoc mode, configure IPs and change routes officially. 
Comment 14 by narendra.sisodiya, Jul 30, 2010
http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/24/adobe-air-peer-to-peer-video-call-concept-android-app-hands-on/ Adobe has shown this concept using AIR and without 802.11s   Can we do it without AIR & 802.11s ? 
Comment 15 by pacob...@gmail.com, Aug 9, 2010
@narendra.sisodiya P2P != mesh. You'd still need underlying IP connectivity for that AIR app to work. OLSR, 802.11s, or some other L2 routing algorithm is still needed.  
Comment 16 by csboyd07, Aug 9, 2010
@pacobell - OLSR has been ported to Android. 
Comment 17 by pacob...@gmail.com, Aug 9, 2010
@csboyd07 Has olsrd been pushed upstream to the android codebase yet? Froyo integration?  
Comment 18 by mmi...@gmail.com, Aug 10, 2010
We have been trying to reach Android team about OLSR integration, but without success.  There is now a GSoC project trying to bring mesh to Android:  http://wlan-lj.net/wiki/Podrobnosti/MeshApp 
Comment 19 by pacob...@gmail.com, Aug 10, 2010
Yeah, I'd seen that project sometime this week. It looks promising, but I have my doubts it'll work without root. Also, being a proactive protocol, it may not be suitable for mobile devices that are CPU and energy constrained. The RA-AODV protocol that 802.11s uses would probably be a better fit in this case. Unfortunately, I don't think the IEEE has even reached a reference draft standard yet, so Google may be hesitant to pull the trigger on that just yet.  
Comment 20 by mmi...@gmail.com, Aug 10, 2010
Yes. It requires root. And yes, it drains the battery in four-five hours. But this is also the problem of WiFi itself not really suitable for mobile phones. There is no much difference with power consumption of being connected to the WiFi AP and using the phone for browsing or being connected to the mesh. But yes, it would be great if you would be just able to leave mesh mode on and thus contribute to the mesh as you move around. 
Comment 21 by mail.mts, Sep 29, 2010
I would be very interesssted in wireless mesh networking as defined by 802.11s as i need a mesh-enabled mobile for my research work. We do research on wlan localization techniques here in our rsearch group and one of our approaches is a cooperative localization using wlan mesh networks. 
Comment 22 by jon.rol...@constitution.org, Oct 5, 2010
I reiterate this for the G2. As we contemplate the likely upcoming global economic collapse, we need an alternative to the backbones for communications. We need a wireless internet of portable nodes. See http://constitution.org/wipnet/wipnet.htm 
Comment 23 by bytecraf...@gmail.com, Oct 5, 2010
@22 I found a workaround: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio 
Comment 24 by jon.rol...@constitution.org, Oct 5, 2010
Ham radio is of course the old alternative for emergency communications, but it is insufficient for reliable data communications among multiple parties spread over the continent. The military has found it to be far superior to walkie-talkies, enabling every soldier with a laptop to share combat intelligence with one another in real time, to find or avoid enemies, acquire targets while minimizing collateral damage, assess situations, find IEDs, and move wounded. Civilians need similar capabilities. 
Comment 25 by Kristofe...@gmail.com, Oct 8, 2010
google already invests in a Mesh style AP company. http://meraki.com  Having them add this ability to the phone would be AWESOME. Think about it, your in a location where WiFi or Cell Infrastructure is damaged or non existent or you and team need a private network to be on at some location. This would allow you to stay in data communication sharing media/chat/P2Talk. Combine it with GPS Google maps a team could each member have a phone on them and they could track each other down. Someone goes missing? Don't worry their current/last location/path was logged by his peers on the mesh network. Need support but can't describe where or what your seeing? record photos/video/P2Talk with gps tag, it goes out on the mesh and all your peers will see it, then their peers. 
Comment 26 by militias...@gmail.com, Oct 8, 2010
See also MeshApp at http://wlan-lj.net/wiki/Podrobnosti/MeshApp 
Comment 27 by glenn.kd...@gmail.com, Oct 19, 2010
Check out hsmm-mesh.org  KD5MFW 
Comment 28 by gjcerc...@circlesoft.com, Feb 3, 2011
The recent events in Egypt and the re-introduction of the "Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" has added new urgency to this issue. Android should offer mesh networking ASAP along with OS agnostic applications that may act as anchor nodes for the mesh. 
Comment 29 by MichaelJ...@gmail.com, Mar 22, 2011
Portable wifi LAN and eventually population-wide mesh networks are where the internet has to go to survive.  Net neutrality regulation is unlikely to be enough to prevent abuse by big telcos, and many are already predicting the Splinternet.  Adding this support will put phones at the forefront of the next wave of internet development.

No comments:

Post a Comment